Tag Archives: students

The Cure to State Terror is Popular Power

Bloomington YDSA issued the following statement at the emergency demonstration earlier this month against the possibility of war with Iran.
The Cure to State Terror is Popular Power
“I knew that I could never again raise my voice against the violence of the oppressed in the ghettos without having first spoken clearly to the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today, my own government.”

Martin Luther King Jr. 

The United States has assassinated Qasem Soleimani, one of the highest-ranking public officials in Iran. It should be clear to all of us what the goals of this attack are. While politicians and public officials cheer at what they call a “decisive blow” to the Iranian Military, while they congratulate themselves on thwarting an “imminent threat,” history lays bare their flimsy justifications. We need only consider Osama bin Laden’s assassination, which did not constitute a “decisive blow” to the power of al-Qaeda. Or Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi’s assassination which clearly did not put an end to the “imminent threat” of ISIS. Not only do organizations such as ISIS and al-Qaeda persist beyond the death of individual members, but the US’s use of violence–often resulting in devastating collateral damage due to sloppily executed attacks and drone strikes that cause indiscriminate harm to bystanders—only adds fuel to the fire that such organizations need to survive. That attacks of this nature result in destabilization and blowback is an indisputable fact. Therefore, when we read about the assassination of Soleimani, all we see is a provocation. All of the powers in the Middle East–from ISIS to Assad, America to Iran– have been threatened by the past three months of anti-sectarian working class uprisings in the central squares and slums of Beirut, Baghdad, and Tehran.  The murder of Soleimani is not just aimed at Iran, but against the risk that ordinary people will refuse to accept international and interreligious war, and instead pursue their class interests. When we see politicians cheering, we all know why: because they want war, and they want it to divide us.
While the Bush administration needed an elaborate lie to justify the war in Iraq, it is remarkable that almost twenty years later, the Trump administration doesn’t even need to bother with such a triviality. This is thanks to a long process in which the United States has asserted its right to use drones to kill anyone in the world without due process of the law. With the unprecedented bombing of Soleimani (the first time the US has openly assassinated a foreign official since World War II), the US now claims the sovereign decision of life or death over everyone in the world, without any due process of law. While such flagrant and extreme actions have previously been reserved for times of crisis and war, the United States now asserts this behavior to be business as usual. Therefore, unlike in the days of the Bush administration, when the hawks want war, they can simply murder a government official of another sovereign nation—openly and publicly—and then claim that any act of retaliation or self-defense is actually an act of aggression. This naked aggression reveals that the US is simply one violent gang among many: unbound, in the last analysis, by any international law. 
We should not fall into the trap of thinking that this murderous behavior merely stems from the erratic and reckless behavior of that crackpot, Donald Trump. When it comes to this attack, Trump has acted precisely in the manner of his “stately” predecessors, Barack Obama and George W. Bush. The latter, who is largely responsible for the deaths of roughly 200,000 civilians during the occupation of Iraq, helped establish the norm of using drones to kill anyone suspected of a crime—never mind the due process of law or civilian lives that are lost in the process. Common sense says that such a president would be utterly offensive to our humanitarian and democratic sensibilities, and that such a president would be sharply condemned by their successor. Yet Obama actually escalated the use of drone attacks to unprecedented levels. It should be no surprise to us, then, that Trump should feel emboldened to openly drop a bomb on a foreign official. At least in this respect, it is clear Bush and Obama paved the way for Trump. The three ought to be considered together as a trio of war criminals.
This bipartisanship that has brought us to the present moment is just as obvious in the criticisms of Trump’s decision to assassinate Soleimani. Nearly all of them take the form: “Soleimani was a dangerous criminal, BUT…”, “Justice was done to Soleimani, BUT…”. What this rhetoric effectively says is: “All our intentions are in the right place. It is understandable why a reasonable person might wish to carry out this attack, although I may disagree with it for one reason or another.” How about we cut the bullshit? Any reasonable person can see that this action puts hundreds of thousands of innocent lives at risk. For that reason, it is nothing short of reprehensible. There is no icing on the cake with actions of such immeasurable danger. 200,000 innocent civilians died in Iraq as a result of this type of behavior. We condemn it in its entirety. 
The idea that this attack will make anyone safer is laughable. How stupid do these politicians really think we are? The recent news headlines speak for themselves: “Officials say New York City is country’s top terror target,” “Boston police taking extra security measures,” “U.S. embassy urges citizens to depart Iraq immediately.” And worse–what the U.S. media cannot even register—is the fact that the danger to American lives is nearly invisible compared to the danger facing the multitude of Iranian civilians and others in the region, especially if the promised Iranian retaliation provokes a U.S. invasion. The United States has proven that it is capable of carrying out such atrocities. We will not put our support behind any of the terroristic gangs practicing violence in the world today.
We can’t let any of the politicians set the terms of the conflict. We won’t accept Islamophobic aggression. We won’t accept endless war in the name of keeping us safe. Our safety lies in building a powerful grassroots movement to fight for a worthwhile future–the same movement already underway in the occupied Tahrir Square in Baghdad.
Bloomington Young Democratic Socialists of America

SASV on Monday’s BLM Demo



Students Against State Violence on the BLM Demonstration,  Monday, October 10, 2016

Students Against State Violence (SASV) and the IU Black Student Union hosted a Black Lives Matter Rally Monday, 10/10, at the Sample Gates, beginning at 6:30pm.The rally and the march that followed were carried out to protest the series of murders of Black people by police around the country during the month of September, as well as to pressure the BPD to cooperate with the family of Joseph Smedley, an IU student who went missing and then was found dead last Fall under suspicious circumstances.

The demonstration on Monday was an opportunity for us all to express our grief and anger about the constant police violence against Black people. This September was a particularly fatal month: On September 14, 13-year-old Tyre King was shot by Columbus, OH police while in possession of a BB gun. On September 16, 40-year-old Terrence Crutcher, an unarmed man, was shot and killed by Tulsa, OK police. On September 20, 43-year-old Keith Lamont Scott, who suffered from a traumatic brain injury, was killed by Charlotte, NC police. 23-year-old Korryn Gaines was killed by Baltimore, MD police after they invaded her home in response to a traffic violation from 5 months earlier. Her 5-year-old child was also shot during the incident, and on September 21 it was announced that the officers involved will not be facing charges. On September 27, 38-year-old Alfred Olango, an unarmed Ugandan immigrant, was killed by El Cajon, CA police, after his sister called emergency services because he was suffering from seizures.

SASV wants to make it clear that we think it is very important to not only focus on male, cis-gendered, or “innocent” victims of police violence. It is necessary for us to research the cases and know the names of Black women and trans people who have suffered at the hands of the police and other forms of state violence, and to defend those who the media and politicians ignore or portray as undeserving of sympathy or defense.

To bring attention to these murders, we heard speeches from Leah Humphrey and Kyra Harvey from Indy10 Black Lives Matter and Kealia Hollingsworth, President of the IU Black Student Union. Leah and Kyra spoke on the leadership role of Black women in the movement, and the need to lift up the stories of Black women who have been killed by the police, who are too often forgotten and ignored. Kealia focused on the experience of Black students on campus here at IU. Members of the theatre troupe for the upcoming play Resilience: Indiana’s Untold Story, about the legacy of Black people in Indiana, provided 200 balloons with the names of victims of police violence on them, which were released at the end of the rally.

Angaza Iman Bahar and OBAM, founding members of IDOC Watch (Indiana Department of Corrections) who are currently incarcerated at Wabash Valley Correctional Facility, called in to the rally to express their support for the Black Lives Matter movement and to inform us about the struggle against prison slavery here in Indiana. Angaza is 41 years old and has been incarcerated for the past 23 years, convicted of the crime of attempted murder of a police officer when he was 18yrs old. He is due to be released in the next 2-3yrs and hopes to return to society and use the consciousness he has gained to add another voice to the movement for justice and social change. His writings can be read here. OBAM is 49 years old, serving a 75 year sentence with 17 more to do. He is a devout vegetarian, and in his words, “a politically conscious brotha” who is working diligently to get his time reduced. In the meantime, he seeks to form quality relationships and network with those on the outside with similar interests.

Then we heard a speech about institutionalized racism in the university context from Yassmin Fashir and a speech by Bella Chavez of GlobeMed, whose uncle Miguel was murdered by police in Oklahoma City in June of 2016. Finally, Stanley Njuguna, of Students for a Democratic Society, delivered an inspirational speech, and we released our balloons, before we took to the streets in protest.

We marched down Kirkwood to College Avenue, and then back east on 3rd street, blocking the whole road, and chanting “Black Lives Matter!”, Whose streets? Our streets!” and “USA, KKK, how many kids did you kill today?” as we marched. We blocked the intersection of 3rd and Lincoln, by the headquarters of the Bloomington Police Department (BPD), in protest of the department’s ongoing refusal to cooperate with the family of Joseph Smedley, a Black student whose body was found in Griffy Lake last Fall under suspicious circumstances. He had been missing for days without any indication being given by IU that a student was missing before his body was found, and his death was pronounced a suicide without sufficient investigation. For more information on Joseph Smedley’s case, please find and follow the “Justice for Joseph” page on Facebook.

During the intersection blockade, Indy10 Black Lives Matter led a call and response of the names of people killed by the police. Next, Andrea M. Sterling spoke on the need for active participation and accountability on the part of allies that goes beyond social media activism and one-off events. She called for sustained commitment to transformative change in our daily lives, through “solidarity, love, and support,” between and going further than protests and exciting actions. “Recognize that if you are here, and if you are really in it,” Andrea said, “then you’re not marching for me. You’re not rallying for me. If you’re fighting for freedom you’re fighting for your own as well.”  You can read her speech here. Then, Peter McDonald, who grew up in Columbus, OH, not far from where Tyre King was killed, spoke on the situation in that city and the institutional forces that drive police violence. Before we left the intersection, there was a spontaneous poetry reading. The intersection blockade lasted over twenty minutes. After that, we continued marching down third street, turned left on Indiana Avenue, and ended the demonstration with a blockade and speak-out in the intersection of Indiana and Kirkwood.

The protest was peaceful: An overwhelming majority of vehicles were able to turn around and find other routes, but a few aggressive drivers ignored courteous requests and alternate directions. Any conflict between drivers and protesters resulted from vehicles attempting to drive into the crowd, endangering lives. At least one protester was injured by a particularly aggressive and thoughtless driver, who tried to ram his SUV through the crowd. The Herald Times,’  report on the protest, written by Abby Tonsing, simply parroted back the BPD and IUPD’s statements about Joseph Smedley rather than engaging with any evidence or alternate viewpoints, and their article focused on the one moment where violence broke out, blaming the violence on protesters. The violence enacted by protesters in that moment was clearly in self-defense: watch the video and see for yourself. The majority of the people in the video are white, because throughout the demonstration white and other non-Black allies formed a perimeter in order to protect the more vulnerable bodies of our Black comrades. Better reporting on the demonstration, by the IDS and WFHB, can be read here and here.

It is completely unsurprising that news reports would portray protesters as “violent” and “scary”; like the police, they work for the elite, and they share the goal of keeping people scared to protest, especially against police violence. News outlets are more able to garner greater attention and viewership by appealing to reactionary aggression, as seen in many comments on these articles, rather than by conveying the messages and voices of those standing up and unifying in the face of systemic violence against black and brown bodies. Additionally, reports of the protest on social media have been met with many disturbing, threatening comments, by State Representative Jim Lucas, among others, often calling for violence against the protestors.

The negative reactions to our demonstration on social media bring into sharp focus the normalized disregard for Black lives that pervades society, and further illustrate the need for transformative change through collective struggle.

Call-in to support a prisoner in struggle

Otis Carr is currently imprisoned at the Wabash Valley Correctional Facility in Carlisle, Indiana and he is requesting our help! Below is a brief description of his situation, and what you can do about it:

From a letter written by Otis Carr # 942245

In his own words:

“During a shakedown by 2 officers… asked me to open my mouth…I was asked 2 times to open my mouth I did as told I was chewing on some prison made candy toffee with half of it still wrapped in plastic…The officers say that they saw ‘something’ in my mouth small but they don’t know what it was but they ‘suspect’ it was drugs.”

In the 2 days following this incident, Carr was subjected to multiple drug tests at Terre Haute Regional Hospital as well as an x-ray at the Wabash correctional facility- all of which came back negative for any traces of drugs.

Despite the evidence proving his innocence in this case, Carr has still been found guilty of Obstruction of Justice, A-100. Additionally, he was not allowed to use the drug tests which he passed as evidence against the charge.

Carr requests our help in putting pressure on the prison to give him a fair chance at self-defense, and demand that they modify his case.

Please call Robert Bugher, IDOC Formal Review Authority at (317) 232 – 5711 and demand that Mr. Carr receive the justice he deserves, and that his case be reviewed.

Personal Info:
Otis Carr #942245
Case No: WVD-16-01-0054
Obstruction of Justice

Microphone demo today against campus rape


From Students Against State Violence:

In light of recent events, a mic demo will be held at the Sample Gates the Thursday after Thanksgiving Break at 4pm.

This will be an open forum for all voices to be heard. Students Against State Violence will be announcing our plans for our continuing Campaign Against Patriarchal Assault. This will be a chance for people to voice their outrage, frustration, fear, and support for victims and one another.

We feel that the attention the home invasion case got and the precedence given to it by the police and the media – while they have remained silent and unhelpful about many other assault cases – is due to the nature of the case, namely that the assailant was a person of color. Students Against State Violence stands in firm opposition to the media’s racist biases and it’s important that this aspect of the case be noted and analyzed.

Join us to break the silence!

Banner drops against campus rape


profits micdemo

From Students Against State Violence:

Today, SASV members installed the two banners pictured below on Ballantine to address the complicity of IU administration in the perpetuation of sexual violence in Bloomington, and to inform others of this event. The top banner was taken down within 5 minutes, and the second was removed about 15 minutes later. It is clear that, when students voice dissatisfaction with the university’s priorities, their response is not to listen, but to shut us down.

Many believe that IU is apathetic towards campus rape, or that administration recognizes the problem but is simply unequipped to resolve it. We propose that, rather, the university has a vested interest in maintaining the normalcy of sexual assault on campus, and in silencing those who speak out against it. IU is not merely an apathetic or cavalier bystander to the rape culture here; it is an active aggressor.

IU is in a unique position in that its research prowess allows for simultaneously maintaining both a reputation as a ‘party school’ and as a legitimate academic institution. This can be – and is – used to foster and market a party culture that draws wealthy, often out of state, students to the university. Not coincidentally, many of these students are part of the ‘Greek’ system, an institution that administrators have a strong financial incentive to cater to. Fraternities breed loyal and generous alumni donors, save them untold millions of dollars in student housing (that they do not have to build or maintain, allowing for the admission of even more students), and serve as a form of advertising for even more potential wealthy donors in the form of undergraduate recruits. The decision to protect fraternities and keep them happy, even when they enact violence against other students, is therefore simply good financial sense.

This division of students – who matters to the university and who doesn’t – can easily be seen when considering who the university feels serves them best financially. This has created a campus culture where some students are allowed to rape with impunity, so long as they are valuable to the university. Fraternity houses that are especially dangerous for women are coddled. Known rapists remain on sports teams, bringing revenue in. Serial rapists with this power know that they are free to violate as many women as they please, and that they can do so with IU’s protection. Their victims are silenced, maligned, and often outright threatened, by university officials. The violation of female and non-binary bodies at Indiana University is the price that administrators happily pay in order to keep funds rolling in.

When IU representatives claim that sexual violence is not the norm on our campus, they are lying. When they claim to be doing everything in their power to eradicate it, they are lying. When President McRobbie claims that he cares, he is lying. We will not be silenced. We will not accept the violation of our bodies as sacrifices for the ‘greater good’ of building the university endowment. They did not win in removing our banners today; they simply reaffirmed to us who they really are. Whether you agree with our analysis of the problem or not – let your voice be heard with us tomorrow.

Account of Bloomington’s May Day 2015


Received from BACF and transmitted:

Last Friday, May First, hundreds of activists from Bloomington gathered at the Indiana University Sample Gates and took to the streets to celebrate International Worker’s Day. This holiday, known as May Day has been celebrated across the world since 1886 in honor of the struggle of labor against capitalism. The first May Day occurred in Chicago as a general strike of hundreds of thousands of workers demanding the eight hour day. Three days later in Haymarket Square,a large gathering in support of the strike was attacked by the police, in the confusion a bomb was thrown into the crowd killing several people. The Chicago police arrested and falsely accused several anarchist activists of the bombing, some of whom were executed or imprisoned. Since then, May Day has been an international symbol of resistance for socialists, anarchists and communists alike. The U.$. and its capitalist government has done everything in its power to erase May Day from the collective memory of the working class, but here in Bloomington in solidarity with others across the nation we took a step toward reclaiming what rightfully belongs to us!

This May Day held special significance as the attention of the masses has been drawn to the Baltimore Uprising as the latest example of mass resistance to capitalist state repression. This fact was not lost on us, and our plan to reclaim May Day quickly became an opportunity to unite the struggle against police violence with the struggle against capitalism by holding a Memorial for Freddie Gray at the conclusion of the May Day march. Our hopes for this endeavor were exceeded by the impressive turnout to both the May Day Rally and the Freddie Gray Memorial. Activists from various student and community organizations opened lines of communication that have put into motion plans to address policing and labor rights in Bloomington.

Both demonstrations took to the streets after a short rally, marching down the middle of Kirkwood avenue and back up Third Street past the Bloomington Police Department. Demonstrators carried signs inscribed with messages of “All Power to Labor” and “Black Lives Matter” side by side, indicating the unity of these struggles. Both marches blocked intersections turning ownership of the streets to us, making our message unavoidable. This experience was significant for the power of its expression but also for teaching us about the efficacy of certain tactics. We have learned that the tactics of demonstrating and marching must be suited to the cohesion of the crowd and the way the political message is mediated by national events. These are the conditions which made the marches, especially the second, successful.

Despite these minor errors, the large turnout and opening of lines of communication have created a foundation on which we can build. Those who spoke at the May Day rally helped make it clear that all struggles against oppression are aspects of the class struggle. We believe we have helped to bring this idea to the Bloomington community. For us, this is only a beginning but it was a strong one. We would like to thank everyone who attended the two demonstrations Friday for your participation and solidarity. We would also like to thank all those groups and individuals who assisted us in spreading the word, you were absolutely essential to drawing a crowd that large in such short notice.
Bloomington Anti-Capitalist Front